Ukraine has been at the center of geopolitical struggles between Russia and the West for decades. Since its independence in 1991, the country has experienced waves of political instability, which have often been influenced, exacerbated, or even orchestrated by external forces, particularly Russia. The Kremlin’s strategy toward Ukraine has consistently aimed to exploit political divisions, economic weaknesses, and governance crises to prevent the country from integrating with Western institutions like the EU and NATO.
Historical Context of Ukraine’s Political Instability
Ukraine’s internal political struggles stem from a combination of historical divisions, systemic corruption, and foreign interference. Key moments of political chaos include:
• 2004 Orange Revolution – After widespread allegations of electoral fraud in favor of pro-Russian candidate Viktor Yanukovych, mass protests led to a re-run of the election, which resulted in the victory of pro-Western candidate Viktor Yushchenko. This was a major setback for the Kremlin, which had backed Yanukovych.
• 2010-2014 Yanukovych Era and Euromaidan – Yanukovych returned to power in 2010, leaning toward Moscow. His rejection of an EU association agreement in favor of closer ties with Russia sparked the Euromaidan protests in 2013-2014, leading to his ousting. This was another geopolitical loss for Russia, which responded by annexing Crimea and fueling a separatist war in Donbas.
• Post-2014 Instability and Ongoing Conflict – Ukraine has struggled with political turmoil ever since, including corruption scandals, power struggles among oligarchs, and the war in eastern Ukraine. Even after Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s election in 2019, political infighting, economic challenges, and war-related pressures have kept Kyiv in a state of volatility.
The Kremlin’s Intermediate Goal: Destabilizing Ukraine
Russia’s long-term objective is to prevent Ukraine from becoming a strong, independent, Western-aligned state. To achieve this, Moscow has pursued a strategy of controlled destabilization, using a mix of political, military, economic, and information warfare tactics.
Political Destabilization
• Supporting pro-Russian politicians and parties – Russia has consistently backed politicians in Ukraine who favor closer ties with Moscow, such as Viktor Yanukovych and pro-Russian opposition leaders.
• Fueling internal divisions – The Kremlin exploits divisions between Ukrainian nationalists and Russian-speaking regions, portraying Kyiv’s government as illegitimate in the eyes of certain segments of the population.
• Spreading disinformation – Russian media and propaganda networks work to undermine trust in Ukraine’s leadership, amplify corruption scandals, and portray Ukraine as a failed state.
Military and Hybrid Warfare
• Annexation of Crimea (2014) – This was both a strategic and psychological blow to Ukraine, showing that Russia was willing to take direct action to secure its interests.
• War in Donbas (2014-Present) – By fueling a separatist conflict in eastern Ukraine, Russia has ensured that Kyiv remains distracted and weakened, preventing it from focusing on internal reforms and NATO integration.
• Direct Military Invasion (2022-Present) – The full-scale invasion in 2022 was aimed at toppling the Ukrainian government and installing a pro-Russian regime. While this goal failed, the ongoing war keeps Ukraine in a state of crisis.
Economic Pressure
• Energy as a weapon – Russia has used gas supplies as leverage, cutting energy exports to Ukraine multiple times to apply economic pressure.
• Trade restrictions and sanctions – Moscow has imposed trade bans and tariffs to harm Ukraine’s economy and weaken public support for pro-Western policies.
The West’s Response and Russia’s Adaptation
Despite Ukraine’s resilience and strong Western support, Russia continues to adapt its strategies. When direct military aggression failed to achieve quick regime change, Moscow shifted its focus back to long-term destabilization:
• Targeting infrastructure to cripple Ukraine’s economy.
• Conducting cyberattacks on Ukrainian institutions.
• Supporting covert political operations to weaken Kyiv’s leadership.
At the same time, Ukraine has made progress in consolidating its identity as a sovereign nation, reducing its economic dependence on Russia, and strengthening its ties with NATO and the EU. However, the ongoing war and internal political challenges mean that instability remains a major issue.
Conclusion: What Lies Ahead?
Kyiv’s political chaos plays directly into the Kremlin’s hands, making it harder for Ukraine to achieve stability, economic growth, and full Western integration. As long as Russia sees Ukraine as a geopolitical battleground, it will continue to exploit internal divisions and external vulnerabilities. The outcome of the ongoing war, the effectiveness of Western support, and Ukraine’s ability to strengthen its institutions will determine whether the Kremlin succeeds in its intermediate goal or if Ukraine can break free from Russia’s destabilizing influence for good.
МК